|
Real Style by Patricia McLaughlin
April 2, 2006
“Myth America: Is how you look
as important as you think?”
Woman A: “Sandra Day O’Connor made such a
tremendously important contribution on the Supreme Court!”
Woman B: “Yes, but why did she stop coloring her
hair?”
Don’t laugh, you know you’ve heard the equivalent a
million times. Marie Curie may have discovered radium, but judging from
her pictures, she never figured out how to control her frizzies. Eleanor
Roosevelt, looking back on a singularly accomplished career, wished
she’d been prettier. Madeleine Albright’s memoir records her long losing
battle to lose weight along with her triumphs as secretary of state.
Georgia O’Keefe looked wonderful in those early Stieglitz portraits, but
she really let herself go later. And so on...
Even now, in supposedly liberated America, no woman
is counted truly successful unless—along with unlocking the secrets of
the universe, making great art, setting foreign policy, whatever—she
looks good while she’s doing it. It wasn’t enough that Ginger Rogers did
everything Fred Astaire did, only backwards and in high heels: She also
had to be beautiful, while Astaire, basset-faced and half-bald, could
get by on charm and talent alone.
Condoleeza Rice hits the trifecta: She has the
brains to be secretary of state, the body to wear high fashion, and she
plays the piano, too!
Truly, it’s no wonder so many women are nuts, one
way or another. Any sane person would be.
And it’s no wonder that many women, like those in
Margo Maine’s and Joe Kelly’s new book, The Body Myth, resort to
starving themselves, or half-starving themselves, or bingeing and
purging, or compulsive exercising.
How many? Nobody knows because, Maine explains,
nobody asks. Nobody tracks eating disorders in adult women. Many doctors
notice if you’re eating too much and not exercising enoughj, but most
don’t bother to ask patients if they’re eating enough, or exercising too
much. And if a woman does see her doctor because she’s worried about the
unhealthy grip food and thinness have on her soul, she’s likely to be
told, as more than one of Maine’s patients has been, how great she
looks.
In this culture, thinness is success, and you don’t
argue with success.
Besides, we tend to think of anorexia and bulimia
as problems of girls, problems they ought to outgrow--if they live long
enough. (The National Institutes of Health, Maine points out, estimates
anorexia’s mortality rate as 12 times higher than that of any other
cause of death among girls aged 15 to 24; it has the highest mortality
rate of all mental illnesses.)
It’s also hard to spot adult eating disorders
because the obsession with thinness that underlies them is pervasive. We
think it’s normal to be willing to do almost anything to be thin. And
that, Maine says, is because we buy in to the “body myth” of her title,
the myth that that “our self worth (and our worth to others) is (and
ought to be) based on how we look, what we weigh, and what we eat.”
Assuming that it’s every woman’s duty to look
wonderful is already problematic: For one thing, it just isn’t possible
for every woman to look wonderful, especially not when you define
wonderful as looking like Kate Moss or Reese Witherspoon or Barbie. What
makes it worse is our assumption—against considerable evidence—that we
ought to be able to control the size and shape of our bodies.
According to Maine, various studies have concluded
that anywhere from 40% to 70% of the factors that control body size and
shape are genetic. Flip through your family album, she says, and you’re
likely to see bodies—your mother’s, your aunt’s, your grandmother’s--
that look like yours, or that look like the body you’ll eventually grow
into.
Oh, no, you’re thinking. Don’t tell me I’m going to
turn into my grandmother! Hate to break it to you, but it happens.
And anyway, as Maine argues, what sense does it
make to “criticize an adult woman because she no longer has the body of
a 16- or 20-year-old.”
Think of the time we waste—not to mention the
money—trying not to look the way we look. Imagine if all the time and
energy invested in trying to lose weight, smooth out wrinkles, tame
cellulite, deflate eyebags, etc., could be applied to ending hunger or
curing cancer. Or even to something that’s at least fun.
One thing the obsession with looks has going for it
is clarity. Life is complicated and confusing. What do you really want?
What should you do—about work, relationships, children, etc.? It’s often
hard to know; there are a million answers.
But how do you want to look? The ridiculous
narrowness of the body ideal our culture promulgates makes the question
a no-brainer. There’s no room for doubt. The same thing that makes the
current exaggerated body ideal unattainable for 98% of us makes it
weirdly compelling. Losing weight, Maine says, becomes “a simple answer
to complex dilemmas.” It never hurts to lose a few pounds.
Until, as Maine’s patients discover, it does.
A century ago, she says, most of the bodies a
person saw belonged to other real people, and were all shapes and all
sizes. Now each of us lives in a virtual world created by media: We see
many more images of bodies than actual ones, and nearly all of the
female bodies we see on TV, in movies, in magazines, etc., are virtually
identical: relatively young, very slender, perfect. Each of us is, in
effect, a solitary ugly duckling surrounded by swans.
How can the body you see in the mirror not suffer
by comparison?
Every Sunday, RealStyle goes to 100 subscribing
newspapers in the United States and Canada (combined circulation: 60
million) from Universal Press Syndicate. |

Media Opportunities
Buy It Now
"Delve into this no-nonsense call
for liberation from the Body Myth to personal freedom. You will emerge
well informed and want to spread the word!"
Emme, supermodel &
author of True Beauty
Contact The
Body Myth
|